![sonarworks reference 4 free sonarworks reference 4 free](https://www.scvdistribution.co.uk/files/sonarworks_432_header.png)
My main problem with MathAudio Room EQ is probably the fact that correction range limiting is not built into the application natively. However I did like MathAudio Room EQ better than I did Reference 4. I found it harder to get good results with it on our main system than with either Dirac Live or ARC3. The above curve I felt solved a lot of the resonances without changing the original sound signature too much and I was happy to proceed and do some casual music enjoyment with it.įor these last two targets unfortunately I didn't do any REW measurements of resulting in room responseĪfter these new tests my initial excitement about MathAudio Room EQ subsided a bit. So I again did two measurement types:Ī) single-point measurement for the MLP only: In our living room MLP is middle seat of our couch, but I also wanted to see if EQ could work on a wider area (hopefully the whole couch). I'll start by saying that this was a bit of a sobering experience for me with regard to MathAudio Room EQ - I was (and am) quite pleased with results I was able to get quite quickly in my nearfield setup, but the living room setup proved to be more challenging to get right with MathAudio. So a pretty different environment vs my nearfield desk setup, with more influence of the reflected sound at the listening position. To set the stage - the tests were done with our living room stereo system, based around two Revel M16 bookshelfs with the main listening position (MLP) at around ~2,3m / 7,5" from either speaker (mid-field or far-field?).
![sonarworks reference 4 free sonarworks reference 4 free](https://rockshop.sirv.com/media/catalog/product/s/o/soundid_reference_app_light_mode_add_headphones_for_screen__2.png)
![sonarworks reference 4 free sonarworks reference 4 free](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f9/87/1a/f9871ad853219e4394b4cdfbb6e14a1f.jpg)
Here's part two of my look at MathAudio Room EQ - living-room edition